How many Gods does it take to screw in a light bulb…? Just one.
Posted by Mark Allen on 25 Sep 2006 | Tagged as: Random Posts
When I first heard about Christian-based, politically conservative, “clean� comedians, I became fascinated. It all seemed so fantastic. I imagined that they were perhaps the bravest stand-ups in the world. Save for a handful of examples, today’s comedy mediums have been starved into a thin, garish, sexual-and-irony over-loaded raketentestgelände. Over-reliance on shock tactics and repetitious sexual innuendo have diluted and transformed a one-rich genre into a rigid, rule-based rocket-testing field, with performers firing off one shock blast after another to trigger gasps from audiences, who’s reactions become more and more robotic and disposable. How could a pro-Christian values, “clean comedy� type of performer even dare to compete in today’s meta-jaded media arena? What a dare!
A certain brand of comedy had always existed in church settings; from clown and puppet ministry troupes which flourished in the 1950’s and 60’s, to motivational youth speakers who used humor to communicate hard-learned life lessons to young minds in the 70’s, to bumper stickers that read “How many Gods does it take to screw in a light bulb? Just one…â€? of the 80’s. But some church performers began to mimic stand-up comedy styles that had become so exceedingly popular in the 80’s. Clown costumes and sock puppets became less of something they used in their act and more something they mocked in their act. The heroic “role modelâ€? of the shouting youth motivational speaker began to get replaced by the self-deprecating humor of a lone person on stage with a microphone making observational humor about maintaining one’s faith in the modern world. Communicating scripture-based messages gave way to “don’t you just hate it whenâ€? or punchline-style monologues, with the moral high-ground stance left to afterthought. In turn, some of these Christian performers started to get really good. Inevitably, 90’s innovators like Mike Warnke and Chonda Pierce branched out. Truly odd birds; they sometimes performed their acts wedged between the usual randy performers at rough-and-tumble comedy clubs, using the unique contrast within their surroundings as the root of their act. Later, performers like Donna East, Rick Younger and Kerri Pomarolli took the genre even farther into the stand-up world. More and more followed suit – but through the late 90’s, the idea never lasted beyond that of a trendy gimmick. “Cleanâ€? comedy nights at popular comedy clubs only lasted as long as the curiosity did.
But the movement made it’s own mark, and survived – if only by creating a massive subculture unto itself (much like Christian rock) rather than trying to constantly assimilate and possibly change the “realâ€? world. Today there are whole nightclubs and festivals that cater to the scene, and the amount of acts that fall into the category of Christian-themed and clean comedy have reached uncountable numbers – spawning a whole industry of video, DVD and merchandise sales which sell through Amazon.com, and chains like Tower Records and Virgin. The proliferation of specialty cable channels which showcase “family orientedâ€? material now feature weekly showcases of clean comedians, which have been embraced by popular ratings. The attachment that some sub-genres of “cleanâ€? comedy may have to Christianity might be only symbolic in some cases, but for the fans it remains crystal clear. The clown and puppet ministries? The humorous youth camp motivational speakers? They’re all still out there… if anything the emergence of a newer kind of Christian comedy genre has only helped them to survive. They exist as second and third stage acts at Christian comedy/music festivals, and their popularity as a more comfortable outlet for humor at older, more traditional, church-only events will probably never fade.
Here is an unbelievably long list of Christian/clean-comedy acts, which covers the entire spectrum from old school puppet and clown ministries, to edgy secular stand-up, and even surprisingly impressive youth-based avant-video Christian prank/comedy collective outreach collectives. There’s even a Weird Al-ish Christian comedy rock band who does God-themed parodies of popular songs; Apologetix. (check here to here mp3s of their covers of Ozzy Osbourne’s ‘Crazy Train,’ called ‘Lazy Brain,’ and Queen’s ‘Bohemian Rhapsody,’ called ‘Bethlehemian Rhapsody’). And here’s another; take a listen to Nick Alexander’s music (including a Catholic version of The Ramones’ ‘I Wanna Be Sedated’ called ‘I Wanna Be Debated’). Here’s a lengthy, investigative piece on Christian Comedy, in the Washington Post, from 2004. Here’s a historic piece (or sorts) on the genre. Here’s a 2002 article from the Dallas Observer that’s pretty blunt, and way funnier than it’s subject (the bit about the woman doing the bad/weird squirrel act is great). Here’s the popular Bananas comedy show site.
However, throughout the genre’s growth – obviously not everyone has approved. The acts who seemed to work best initially were those who worked into their act the very frustrations of how living a life of faith awkwardly translated into their chosen profession, and the modern world at large. Some even poked fun at examples of the more extreme characteristics within the Christian world. In his 2004 act, Brad Stine poked fun of church groups burning Harry Potter books, noting “Here’s a good rule of thumb: If Hitler tried it – maybe go the other way.â€? Stine currently bills himself as “America’s conservative comedian,â€? and has written books with titles like Live From Middle America: Rants From a Red-State Comedian and Being a Christian Without Being an Idiot and A Conservative Unleashed. Indeed, our current political climate has hatched a sub-spawn of the genre; comedians who lean even farther from Christian or “cleanâ€? styles, and reach out into politically conservative-based material.
In the regular world of entertainment/news/whatever, there’s the “mainstream,â€? which is the easily definable and perfect; like the things you see on cable TV, news shows, at the regular movies, radio and big-name websites and stuff like that, things backed by corporations-for-profit mostly. Then, there’s an “undergroundâ€? – the undefinable and open-ended; things on really obscure websites, way-indie film, most of the gallery art world, experimental music scenes, nutty cable access TV, avant local theater troupes, weird art prank stuff, sick fanzines, drug culture, parties, nightclubs, etc., things usually done with little backing and created just for the sake of ideas, and often done with a subtle defiance against the mainstream (you know the stuff I’m talking about!) Mainstream stuff usually works because it has funded, commercial backing and promotion that can create a synergy with goods of a certain quality. The underground stuff that becomes popular in it’s own realm is usually not because it has high sales marks or is bringing in “good numbers,â€? but because it’s just really good; it’s so screamingly funny that it makes you almost cry from laughing so hard, or it’s so ingenious that it hits an as-yet undefined truth and twists your mind and changes your perspective on things. The mainstream stuff, when it works right, can pride itself on creating “perfect,â€? lasting works of art that can change the entire planet’s consciousness in a blink. The underground world, besides being a rich world unto itself, can pride itself on almost always being the actual genesis of the concepts and ideas that get watered down and bubble up into the mainstream world. There’s a line (a squiggly line, but indeed a ‘line’) between the underground and mainstream that is crossed (both ways) only with obvious compromise. Smart mainstream performers who do appreciate the more extreme characteristics of the underground worlds know how to filter ideas out of it in a way so as not to alienate the massive audiences. But, not all mainstream performers appreciate the more extreme underground, they may find it to be “wrong,â€? politically incorrect, or even harmful. The mainstream has solid stability, but the underground has a thrilling aura of danger. The underground may have guts, but the mainstream has a quota to fill.
Do you know what the “underground� for the Christian and politically conservative comedy scene is? What their crazy/dangerous/not-ready-for-prime-time underbelly is? Extreme right-wing white supremacy groups, deadly anti-abortion militia collectives, Fred Phelps and his gang, crazy gory anti-abortion websites, rapturous end-of-the-world conspiracy websites, satan-is-everywhere conspiracy websites, neo-Nazi skinheads, scripture-screaming polygamy cults, anti-minority fascist groups with bombs, The American Family Association, The Army of God, Paul Hill, Timothy McVeigh.
And this is why Ann Coulter is the Lenny Bruce of the Christian, “clean,� politically-conservative stand-up comedy world.
“Ann Coulter is the Lenny Bruce of the Christian “clean”, politically-conservative satnd-up comedy world.”
Mark, you are brilliant and so right on!
Thanks.
durlx
Holy cow! I’m still laughing @ the Beatrice the poodle blog. Looks like I have to read more!!
oh my…
Mercy
I love the Beatrice poodle post…holy smokes!
I’ll be reading more,
Mercy
mark, you and your readers may enjoy seeing this, enjoy? anyway here it is:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/26/anti-gay-summit/
I witnessed one of those “clean” comedy nights on cable that you speak of. The comedians were about as funny as Ann Coulter.
Sin.,
Mr. Nose